Data-led article
These are three compact models teams often shortlist before moving up to flagship pricing. Start with the cost curve, then check context and benchmark availability before choosing a route to test.
At a glance
These figures are based on the site's current model data as checked on May 31, 2026. Extra tool charges, cache writes, grounded requests, and computer-use fees are not included in the sample monthly cost below.
A newer GPT-5 line option when you want strong tool support, reasoning, prompt caching, and a full 128k context window.
What to watch: It is more expensive than Gemini and close to Claude in this write-heavy sample, so the GPT-5.4 capability surface needs to matter.
Low-cost multimodal apps that need broad input support, lower output spend, and Google-native retrieval options.
What to watch: The output price is attractive, but the context window is smaller than GPT-5.4 Mini and the model surface is less conventional than Claude for agent workflows.
Teams already leaning on Anthropic workflows such as prompt caching, computer use, and PDF-heavy assistants.
What to watch: It is materially more expensive than the other two in a write-heavy app, so it needs feature fit to justify the bill.
Jump into the compare tool with these three models already selected, or drill into the detail page for a single model.
Scenario
Sample workload: 100,000 requests per month, 1,000 input tokens, and 400 output tokens per request.
| Model | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Monthly cost | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.4 Mini Azure AI | $0.75 | $4.50 | $255.00 | Newest GPT-5 family option here, with the strongest OpenAI-style tool and reasoning surface. |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google | $0.25 | $1.50 | $85.00 | Cheapest output cost here, with broad multimodal inputs and URL context. |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | $1.00 | $5.00 | $300.00 | Most expensive in this workload, but strongest Anthropic-native agent surface. |
At $85.00, it stays ahead because its output price is lower than GPT-5.4 Mini and much lower than Claude Haiku 4.5.
If your app keeps long threads or large retrieved chunks in one call, the extra headroom matters more than a small delta on input price.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has benchmark rows on its model page. Treat GPT-5.4 Mini and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite here as price, context, and capability comparisons until their benchmark rows are available.
How to choose
When you want the newer GPT-5.4 line with strong tool calling, prompt caching, web search, image input, reasoning support, and a 128k context window without moving up to a pro-tier route.
When your app writes a lot, or when multimodal input matters more than raw context size. It is the most economical writer here and the broadest on audio, video, and URL input.
When you specifically want Anthropic's workflow surface, especially prompt caching, computer use, and PDF-heavy agent patterns. It needs that fit because the token bill is higher.
Sources
Use the provider docs for final pricing checks. This comparison keeps to the clean shared baseline of input and output token prices, but each provider adds its own rules for caching, tools, and grounded requests.
Azure AI